🏠Home
👥Network
💼Jobs
💬Messaging
🔔Notifications
EU

European Commission — DG ENER

Official page · 1.2M followers
📍 Posted from Brussels · 2h · 🌍

We're revising the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive. Before we finalise, we want one specific thing from professionals like you: where your operational reality diverges from our modelling.

In the last revision cycle we heard three reservations from facilities managers, building owners and renovation specialists:

1️⃣ The 2030 deep-renovation targets assume tenant cooperation that, in mixed-tenure portfolios, is rarely achievable in one cycle.
2️⃣ Sub-metering obligations interact badly with district-heating contracts in some Member States.
3️⃣ The post-retrofit "performance gap" (modelled vs measured kWh) is consistently underestimated in the impact assessment.

If you've worked on a real building, you have evidence we don't have. We've kept the structured briefing short (8 minutes to read, 5 to respond).

8 min
EPBD Revision · briefing for professionals · respond by 14 March
Quick poll — which of the three is most blocking on your projects?
1 · Tenant cooperation34%
2 · District-heating & sub-metering22%
3 · The performance gap44%
8 412 votes · 3 days left

Your answers will be cross-referenced with input from tenants reached by post and with the expert track — same synthesis. #EPBD #BuildingsDecarbonisation #EUasksyou

Powered by the Context Translator · this consultation also runs on TikTok, by post, and through citizen assemblies.

👍 Like
💬 Comment
🔁 Repost
↗ Send
SR
Sara Romano · Energy auditor, Milan
Performance gap is huge in southern condominium retrofits — wall insulation modelling doesn't account for the way residents actually ventilate. Happy to share three case studies.
JT
Jonas T. · Housing co-op board, Copenhagen
Glad you're going to the tenants in parallel. The last consultation was a homeowner's room.
← back to gallery